Home

Gemacht aus platzen Konsultieren shoe branding europe bvba v adidas and ohim Zwietracht Tunnel Erwachen

Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand
Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand

Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe  Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog
Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog

adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel  stripes placed on the side of sports shoes
adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel stripes placed on the side of sports shoes

The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel  Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness  – SCRIPTed
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than  Stripes – Infusion Lawyers
Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than Stripes – Infusion Lawyers

CURIA - Documentos
CURIA - Documentos

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA  against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh

Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law

Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe  Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv
Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes  trademark: Dennemeyer
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer

6/19/2019 CURIA - Documents curia.europa.eu /juris/document/document_print.jsf?docid=215208&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&
6/19/2019 CURIA - Documents curia.europa.eu /juris/document/document_print.jsf?docid=215208&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

K-Swiss Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks  and Designs) (OHIM) Case T 3/15
K-Swiss Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) Case T 3/15

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual  property | The Guardian
Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual property | The Guardian

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion  Industry
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky